cod 5 looks pants
Forum Home
Game: Call of Duty 4 (PS3)
Call of Duty 4 Forum (PS3)
Forum: PlayStation 3 Forum
Last post by: tiberianwolf on 21 Jul 2008 at 22:49 (Jump to Last Post)
Viewing page: 3 of 3
Total posts: 51
Total views: 1189
Post: #41 - 12 Jul 2008 11:18
fair enough
its just that ww games never excited me as much as mw
its just that ww games never excited me as much as mw
Post: #42 - 13 Jul 2008 10:07
right this is why it is made by 2 different publishers
the people behind the Call of duty want it to be a yearly game but that is impossible for 1 publisher because it takes 2 years to make so while cod5 is being realeased co6 will be in production by infinity ware
the people behind the Call of duty want it to be a yearly game but that is impossible for 1 publisher because it takes 2 years to make so while cod5 is being realeased co6 will be in production by infinity ware
-----signature-----
Utd Home Page!
Man Utd 4 League n Champions league
R.I.P Dringo U Was A Quality Player M8
R.I.P Ollie
Utd Home Page!
Man Utd 4 League n Champions league
R.I.P Dringo U Was A Quality Player M8R.I.P Ollie
Post: #43 - 13 Jul 2008 20:53
Developers (Infirmity Ward & Treyarch) make games, publishers distribute them. Activistion have published CoD since the PC only days. Then they got money hungry and went consoles. Boo.
EDIT: @ Stags above
--Post edited on 13/07/2008 20:53:51
EDIT: @ Stags above
--Post edited on 13/07/2008 20:53:51
Post: #44 - 13 Jul 2008 21:03
Quote:
Developers (Infirmity Ward & Treyarch) make games, publishers distribute them. Activistion have published CoD since the PC only days. Then they got money hungry and went consoles. Boo.
EDIT: @ Stags above
definitely. and now they're calling it "world at war" just to reset the number count.
a bit like rainbow 6 vegas... don't get me wrong though i love that game
Developers (Infirmity Ward & Treyarch) make games, publishers distribute them. Activistion have published CoD since the PC only days. Then they got money hungry and went consoles. Boo.EDIT: @ Stags above
definitely. and now they're calling it "world at war" just to reset the number count.
a bit like rainbow 6 vegas... don't get me wrong though i love that game
Post: #45 - 19 Jul 2008 17:34
awsome so is cod6 goin 2 be old warfare or new dya reckon!!!
Post: #46 - 19 Jul 2008 18:06
i predict killzoney-sci-fi. although every single call of duty is the same but with different coats of paint
Post: #47 - 20 Jul 2008 16:43
If it ain't broke dont fix it
-----signature-----
MSN: simon-y@live.co.uk
My Youtube Channel Honors:
#1 Most Viewed (today) - Musicians - United Kingdom
#29 Most Viewed (Today) - United Kingdom
#11 Most Viewed (This Week) - Musician
MSN: simon-y@live.co.uk
My Youtube Channel Honors:
#1 Most Viewed (today) - Musicians - United Kingdom
#29 Most Viewed (Today) - United Kingdom
#11 Most Viewed (This Week) - Musician
Post: #48 - 20 Jul 2008 17:59
I'm currently playing:
Quote:
If it ain't broke dont fix it
and thats where the world goes round...
if we left everything that worked as it was... cars and spaceshuttles would've never been invented... cos if we "stuck" at something that worked and never tried to improve it.... we wouldnt be where we are today.... and EVERY invention comes with "trial and error" just that you dont hear it so often
If it ain't broke dont fix itand thats where the world goes round...
if we left everything that worked as it was... cars and spaceshuttles would've never been invented... cos if we "stuck" at something that worked and never tried to improve it.... we wouldnt be where we are today.... and EVERY invention comes with "trial and error" just that you dont hear it so often
Post: #49 - 20 Jul 2008 19:11
Quote:
If it ain't broke dont fix it
there exists a thing... it's called "bored to death of having the same things time and time again".
no they shouldn't fix it they should change it completely. hell they got rid of the numbers for COD5 because the constant rehashing becomes too evident.
If it ain't broke dont fix itthere exists a thing... it's called "bored to death of having the same things time and time again".
no they shouldn't fix it they should change it completely. hell they got rid of the numbers for COD5 because the constant rehashing becomes too evident.
Post: #50 - 21 Jul 2008 19:58
Quote:
Quote:
If it ain't broke dont fix it
and thats where the world goes round...
if we left everything that worked as it was... cars and spaceshuttles would've never been invented... cos if we "stuck" at something that worked and never tried to improve it.... we wouldnt be where we are today.... and EVERY invention comes with "trial and error" just that you dont hear it so often
Yeah but stuff that were used before cars were quite flawed so needed 'fixing', whereas CoD doesnt have flaws that need improving.
Quote:If it ain't broke dont fix itand thats where the world goes round...
if we left everything that worked as it was... cars and spaceshuttles would've never been invented... cos if we "stuck" at something that worked and never tried to improve it.... we wouldnt be where we are today.... and EVERY invention comes with "trial and error" just that you dont hear it so often
Yeah but stuff that were used before cars were quite flawed so needed 'fixing', whereas CoD doesnt have flaws that need improving.
-----signature-----
MSN: simon-y@live.co.uk
My Youtube Channel Honors:
#1 Most Viewed (today) - Musicians - United Kingdom
#29 Most Viewed (Today) - United Kingdom
#11 Most Viewed (This Week) - Musician
MSN: simon-y@live.co.uk
My Youtube Channel Honors:
#1 Most Viewed (today) - Musicians - United Kingdom
#29 Most Viewed (Today) - United Kingdom
#11 Most Viewed (This Week) - Musician
Post: #51 - 21 Jul 2008 22:49
I'm currently playing:
cod got a lot of flaws like your team AI being completely usless do they know how to use there guns (cod 4 may be for this not sure havn't play it)
-----signature-----
Change Country
RSS
Who Is Online?
There are 80 users onlineThere are 4 registered users online and 76 guests
Registered users:
GamesTracker,
dpb_69,
dragonx79,
Odin2001
Friends Online:
None (Change)
(Based on site visitors over the past 5 minutes, figures exclude web spiders/robots)